Replies

This is something that confused me the other day when I heard Tim Ballard. He was adamantly distancing himself from Qanon, yet, unless I’m not understanding something, I thought Q was basically all about saving the kids from an evil cabal of world elites who are using them sexually, and ritually. I didn’t understand why he was so vehemently distancing himself, seeing as this is exactly what he is exposing!

Now, OTOH, it may have been the cadre of “anons” he was not wanting to be associated with.....I don’t know, but this would make more sense to me.

To me, the whole problem with the Qanon stuff was not the Q part, but the many people who did a whole lot of speculating that was really over the top. Personally, I had no problem with Q - from what I understood of it. I just didn’t know that it was actually true, and as far as can tell, nobody does. Do I hope it’s true - you bet I do. These days I am thinking more and more that it is NOT the psyop that so many have said it is.

I reasoned it this way.....the left is constantly ridiculing Q. If it was an actual psyop, then the left would WANT us believing in it. But they’re ridiculing, which is contradictory to what they should be doing. If it’s a psyop, they should be promoting it, thus being able to laugh at us when it blows up.

In any case, it’s a shame that so many people started interpreting some very wild things about Q, and all to monetize. Weird people, IIRC, like that Simon Parkes and Charlie Ward. They said numerous things and gave dates, and nothing materialized. They did no good to the Q movement. My mind is still open, I’m leaning more and more to something going on behind the scenes, and any questions I have are just my way of trying to find out the truth.

Whereas Jim explained the importance of Q..and Anons. He said they knew of the children situation before he started on the movie. He started being approached by Anon's during the making. It was Anons working with others ALL around the world to help make list of questions for Q to answer and try to make sense of the drops.

My self to judge who is sane and who isn't is a high talent I'm not able to make. Discernment was and still is, for me to use even now. I myself try not to judge anyone giving their thoughts on a very deep involved world mess. I myself have been wrong on people and we were told misinformation is necessary sometimes.

Only my view.

The reason they associated it to Qanon is because of the statements by Jim Caviezel about adrenichrome and child sacrifice, which I believe but has not been exposed by video footage etc. Could get killed doing that it seems. Also Jim on Bannon’s war room was quite emotional when describing some of these things and had a hard time articulating his point, words got mixed up.

What I have taken from what Tim Ballard is saying and I heard Jim say the same thing, this movie was in the making before there even was a Q.

Q nor anons had anything to do with it.

The LSM/Demonrats have smeared Q and anons as kooky conspiracy theorists and much worse, they are trying to tie the SOF to them and the smear.

Have you heard how they are saying Jim goes to their meetings and speaks, follows Q?

That there are dog whistles to Qanons all over the film?

He has stated all lies.

If the LSM/Demonrats succeed in this smear connection it will hurt the movie, their good work and their reputations.

So I can understand why those involved with SOF are distancing themselves from Q because all the lies of the left.