![]() | ![]() |
Re Ballard tie:
I thought that second image looked iffy. ThankQ, foldspace. I knew there had to be a better explanation.
Thanks for sharing that and clearing things up. I’m permanently banned from Twitter and haven’t seen this mentioned anywhere else.
Thanks for the dig. When someone is determined to find dirt, they are sure to find something, even if it isn’t actual dirt.
The ‘system’ has players on the ‘light side’ and on the ‘dark side’. I would not be surprised if people, movies, conferences, etc that have a good shiny appearance have something/someone underneath or behind it with a hidden purpose.
For example, be careful if this movie is the impetus to chip and track all children with the guise of ‘for their safety’ but in actuality the intent is much more sinister.
It should be ok for a post of Ballard’s possibly fishy tie design, and then allow for others to dig and add information. It is not ok to vilify the poster and pile on with talking points and attaboys.
At some point early on, Pence was on the WH list. Long-time, diligent posters —including me— were ridiculed and degraded for putting forth evidence and concerns to the contrary. Same is true with Bill Barr, Sessions, and Flynn. Even to consider data to the contrary of their WH status or good intentions was/is blasphemy.
The overt reaction to data that diverges from the thread narrative makes people think that something may be guiding posts here on the thread, other than digging and discussion.