How could that be a problem. The owner of the AI owns its product, unless another agreement supersedes that.
Sounds like some sort of Full Employment Act for the lieyahs.
I believe it will depend on the AI application EULA.
Recognition and compensation for any licensed input data used for AI training should be paid based on output generated by the AI.
My company is struggling with this now. We’re told not to use any code it generates.
This feels like Napster all over again. You can say what you want but people are going to use it, even quietly.
Interesting question! If two people ask AI the same question, will they get the same answer? If not, who opens it?
China?
Libtards will put a leftist written AI in charge of everything and everyone
Watch and see it’s already happening
I think that they want every single person to try all the types of AI, photos, font, writing, etc, and then down the line “They” will seek forced compensation for usage or shut down any and all devices using anything remotely connected to their AI.
The tooth fairy?
If one uses a grammar-checker on a biographical article about, say, Isaac Newton, does the owner of the grammar-checker have a claim to the article?
Each AI system will eventually go to war with other AI systems.
The world will quickly realize that nothing that is viewed remotely can be trusted; that nothing written can be trusted.
Civilization will devolve to line-of-sight, room-based communication. Even phones won’t be trusted.
There’s some data that most of these stories leave out. I’ve tinkered with an AI program that generates pictures. You have to describe what you want it to draw, then you have to refine it, tell it things that you want, things that you DON’T want, etc. It can get VERY technical!
So, considering THAT, I think the person who describes the picture would be the “author”, and should get rights.