Posted on 06/22/2023 5:09:25 PM PDT by Twotone
How could that be a problem. The owner of the AI owns its product, unless another agreement supersedes that.
Sounds like some sort of Full Employment Act for the lieyahs.
I believe it will depend on the AI application EULA.
Recognition and compensation for any licensed input data used for AI training should be paid based on output generated by the AI.
My company is struggling with this now. We’re told not to use any code it generates.
This feels like Napster all over again. You can say what you want but people are going to use it, even quietly.
Interesting question! If two people ask AI the same question, will they get the same answer? If not, who opens it?
China?
Libtards will put a leftist written AI in charge of everything and everyone
Watch and see it’s already happening
Don’t go down the Black Rock / Aladdin rabbit hole . . .
I think that they want every single person to try all the types of AI, photos, font, writing, etc, and then down the line “They” will seek forced compensation for usage or shut down any and all devices using anything remotely connected to their AI.
That makes a frightening amount of sense to me.
Could liken it to Monsanto:
If any of their GMO pollen lands on your heritage strain crops, then by golly you owe Monsanto big bucks.
It is so evil and devious that the masses will not even blink an eye while others, like us who are awake and see the light, know the death and enslavement that lies ahead.
The tooth fairy?
Indeed.
About every day, I give thanks that at least I am old and sans progeny.
If one uses a grammar-checker on a biographical article about, say, Isaac Newton, does the owner of the grammar-checker have a claim to the article?
Each AI system will eventually go to war with other AI systems.
The world will quickly realize that nothing that is viewed remotely can be trusted; that nothing written can be trusted.
Civilization will devolve to line-of-sight, room-based communication. Even phones won’t be trusted.
I do have some years left in me, I am in no hurry to step into the next dimension but I also do not want to live in an electronic bug eating slave world and will die fighting for my country.
There’s some data that most of these stories leave out. I’ve tinkered with an AI program that generates pictures. You have to describe what you want it to draw, then you have to refine it, tell it things that you want, things that you DON’T want, etc. It can get VERY technical!
So, considering THAT, I think the person who describes the picture would be the “author”, and should get rights.
My company is struggling with this now. We’re told not to use any code it generates.
= = =
Can you change a couple of lines, that have little or no effect on the performance?
So it is now YOUR code?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.