RN — if posts from GAW, or regarding the Brunson case, are “no-go” on the Q thread, please have this post deleted. I won’t take offenses.
Anyway, The Brunsons are back. Found on GAW:
https://greatawakening.win/p/16bPnwI0V1/brunson-case-update/
Unless there’s something going on under the radar that the general public doesn’t know about, Loy Brunson is misrepresenting things. Distributing a case for conference is NOT the same as hearing the case. Setting a case for conference merely means that the Supremes will discuss whether to hear the case or not. They denied Case No. 22-380 what, three times? I hope something comes of this one, but I’m not tremendously optimistic.
25 years in the legal profession lets you see a lot of weird stuff. Never heard of anything like the Brunson case succeeding. But, I could be wrong. This is one time where I’d very much LIKE to be wrong. We’ll see.
The Brunson case has been discussed a lot on TS, especially by Tracy Beanz who is good at legal stuff.
The Brunson case is a nothingburger, and the brothers presenting it more or less scamsters or idiots of some sort. It’s legally totally full of holes, unsound.