Very disappointed in Durham after listening to that!
Did they get to him or is he grossly unqualified for the task he was given?
Well, Durham was a let down. Pretty much what I expected from him. But this might pick you up a bit? McCarthy’s HOR just voted (4:00 PST) to Censure Schiffty for all his lying krap. Vote was 213-—209. The HOR dimchicks could not contain themselves. CSPAN showed the floor and it sounded like the adults at Charlie Brown’s place: rabble rabble babble, dibble, mumble. A bit of a viktery anyhow.
Very disappointed in Durham after listening to that!
Did they get to him or is he grossly unqualified for the task he was given?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Remember the two people, lemme remember...Sussman and someone else? That Durham brought to trial? and the jury in DC said “not guilty”? What do you think would happen if Durham brought any of the criminals to trial now? Clearly the same result.
The only way is the military. These criminals are guilty of sedition and treason, working with foreign governments and entities. Thus these criminals can be considered enemy combatants and be tried by the military. With our current corrupt justice system, they’d only be judged “not guilty”.
“Very disappointed in Durham after listening to that!
Did they get to him or is he grossly unqualified for the task he was given?”
Durham sounded like he was nervous. Not what I expected from him based on his reputation.
Gaetz cut him no slack, and deservedly so.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Got to him is my guess. We (and Q) lost this particular battle (i.e., over Durham).
Regardless, the cover up is intact...at least as far as any consequences.
Baer (Fox) used this against Trump, saying "Not proven" about election theft, when the true statement would be "Coverup intact"...just like so many ops including JFK, 911, Fauci/CCP/Pelosi/Covid/Vax et al.
Cover ups intact.
HOWEVER, many more minds are opening to the capture of government agencies by forces seeking world domination.