To: Steve Van Doorn; Gulf War One; TangoLimaSierra
The UCMJ is especially designed to fairly try all domestic enemies of the Constitution, especially members of the military." ~~~~~~ I don't disagree with you. That is their job. Though we see our system is an expanded regulatory capture. I'm suggesting as with our civil courts it's likely that the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) was also captured. To think that it's not under estimates the power of the Cabal. To be clear regulatory capture in our case likely is foreign adversaries though that isn't required for this to happen. The Danger of Regulatory Capture https://youtu.be/udoqK5AfYpw ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you think that, then you must also be on the "Q failed/lied/is a LARP" side. In that case, why bother posting on the Q thread?
1,836 posted on
06/21/2023 2:56:10 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(Never worry about anything. Worry never solved any problem or moved any stone.)
To: Steve Van Doorn; Gulf War One; TangoLimaSierra
Let me try that again.
The UCMJ is especially designed to fairly try all domestic enemies of the Constitution, especially members of the military.”
....
I don’t disagree with you. That is their job. Though we see our system is an expanded regulatory capture. I’m suggesting as with our civil courts it’s likely that the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) was also captured. To think that it’s not under estimates the power of the Cabal.
To be clear regulatory capture in our case likely is foreign adversaries though that isn’t required for this to happen.
The Danger of Regulatory Capture
https://youtu.be/udoqK5AfYpw
....
If you think that, then you must also be on the “Q failed/lied/is a LARP” side. In that case, why bother posting on the Q thread?
1,839 posted on
06/21/2023 2:59:30 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(Never worry about anything. Worry never solved any problem or moved any stone.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson