No, just clarifying. Not sure your point here. Regardless, your reliance on CNN was out of date, as the indictment clearly stated the audio was related to an interview for a book, and that Trump knew and consented to being recorded.
Not sure your point here.
Why am I not surprised.
When you go back and look at it as a whole, might you consider that I was leaving the backstory/breadcrumbs and had not gotten to the end of it? I'm prone to do that.
Post something, get up the next piece, post that, get up the next...you know.
Did I STOP at the CNN articles or did I proceed as if that was the end of the story?
NO! I wanted to know what you had found and I even asked you which page of the indictment covered your statement. I wanted to learn more.
I get "I was clarifing" as a response. Shouldn't you have clarified things before posting your original comment?
Are you trying to play the victim by blaming me???
Ignominy lasts and you bring heaps of it upon yourself.