Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: linMcHlp

Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Nat'l Archives & Records Admin.
United States District Court, District of Columbia.
Mar 1, 2012
845 F. Supp. 2d 288 (D.D.C. 2012)
Civil Action No. 10–1834 (ABJ).
2012-03-1

[From Judge Berman's memorandum opinion, EXCERPTS:]

Defendant has moved to dismiss [Dkt. # 6] under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

The Court will grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) because plaintiff's claim is not redressable. NARA does not have the authority to designate materials as “Presidential records,” NARA does not have the tapes in question, and NARA lacks any right, duty, or means to seize control of them.

In other words, there has been no showing that a remedy would be available to redress plaintiff's alleged injury even if the Court agreed with plaintiff's characterization of the materials. Since plaintiff is completely unable to identify anything the Court could order the agency to do that the agency has any power, much less, a mandatory duty, to do, the case must be dismissed.



29 posted on 06/13/2023 7:47:02 PM PDT by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: linMcHlp

Link to the case:

https://casetext.com/case/judicial-watch-inc-v-natl-archives-records-admin


30 posted on 06/13/2023 8:14:26 PM PDT by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson