Posted on 06/09/2023 4:39:13 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
According to explosive reporting, the powerful internal investigative body that oversees the nation’s intelligence agencies found a whistleblower’s claims of an illegal government UFO crash retrieval and exploitation effort to be “credible and urgent.” To eliminate potential ambiguity regarding such an extraordinary development, a knowledgeable source confirmed to me that the intelligence community inspector general found “allegations that there is a [UFO crash retrieval] program [to be] urgent and credible.”
Beyond this stunning revelation, the whistleblower — a former high-level intelligence official — is represented by a lawyer who served previously as the intelligence community’s first inspector general, a Senate-confirmed position. The managing partner of the law firm representing the whistleblower reportedly co-signed the complaint submitted to the current Intelligence Community inspector general. As noted in a legal analysis, no lawyer, let alone two high-caliber attorneys, would sign such an extraordinary document without “very credible source material.”
Importantly, current and former officials vouched for the whistleblower, David Grusch, while also corroborating the broad outlines of his allegations. Moreover, Grusch testified to Congress for hours, generating hundreds of pages of transcripts. Grusch also gave an exclusive interview to Ross Coulthart of NewsNation, which like The Hill is owned by Nexstar Media Group.
For their part, Grusch and other knowledgeable individuals who have spoken to investigators have little incentive to lie. “Knowingly and willfully making false statements” to the Intelligence Community Inspector General carries the risk of financial penalties and imprisonment. At the same time, two high-caliber attorneys appear unafraid of the potential legal jeopardy of filing Grusch’s complaint.
The facts enumerated above should, on their face, captivate every newsroom and living room in America. But there are reasons to be skeptical.
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
Don’t worry about it. The UFO’s are here trying to tell us the sun is going to blow up.
Ain't that the truth. And toss in "Weekend at Bernies," "Cabaret," and "Birdcage."
(It is like the End Times has been merged with The Twilight Zone)
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3905139/posts
Please note my comments in the original post body
(And toss in “Weekend at Bernies,”)
Bernie would have done less damage than Jao Bai Den
“...claims of an illegal government UFO crash retrieval and exploitation effort”
So... does the article cite the specific USC which prohibits “UFO crash retrieval and exploitation”. Yeah, I’d like to see a citation for that.
It’s like online gamers telling other players some action is “illegal”.
I have always been unable to verify the bonides of such folks, and just being in the intelligence services is not in itself verification of the actual role someone had. For instance, Jim Serivan who was in the Clandestine Services division at the CIA tells us nothing about if his role there intersected with anything having to do with UFOs. He unsurprisingly does know alot about how things in the intelligence services work but that also is not verification of anything in his official work that was related to UFOs.
In so many cases we are left with trying to just take what folks say at face value.
This was fruitful. I might have just figured it out. If we can stay sane, we can assume this life a success.
You've been regularly promoting alien enthusiasts here like Simon Parkes, and also endorsed the the idea that aliens known as "The Galactics" would be helping to impose a Quantum Financial System on us.
Semivan has been very clear—he had no official role having to do with UFOs.
He is relating his personal experiences—nothing more, nothing less.
There are thousands more all over the world in all walks of life just like him.
Imho many of them are telling the truth as best they can.
Yes. We are left with taking their personal experieces at face value. That’s all we have. But, when - 99% of the time - there is no independent evidence for that same experience, we cannot just take things at facce value.
Do you want to see the specific USC which prohibits that?
Just an “Independence Day” style visit to the White House is what I’d like to see. That would prove they are friendly and thoughtful.
I won't kill myself. They will, "To Serve Man."
My bile will taint the meat, spelled MEat.
:)
That’s the spirit! I knew I could count on you.
I can be so predictable. But while you can count on me, it would be Richard Kiel's robed space alien with the plastic bald cap who would divide me, after multiplying my stress and subtracting from my days.
Happy happiness.
There has been more witness evidence of UFOs than the existence of Jesus.Please back up that claim - I mean for eye-witnesses. As for "witness evidence," if you're not one of the billions who has witnessed Christ in their lives, then you're looking in all the wrong places.
There are hundreds, nay, thousands of people who have seen UFOs and artifacts and have risked personal ridicule and perhaps death upon reporting what they saw. If you want to know who the are and what they said, just search the Internet.
I'll not go into my personal relationship with Christ again because your search function for this forum still works. It is immaterial for the point I was making.
Witness statements convict people of crimes all the time.
They are an excellent source of data—not perfect—but excellent.
This is a podcast where witnesses of alien contact are interviewed.
Have fun:
https://podbay.fm/p/aliens-and-artists
There are thousands more where these came from....
“Witness statements convict people of crimes all the time.”
It is known that witness statements are unreliable - what they think they saw is often found to not be what happened; perpsective (diferent perspective different view of the same thing and different interpretation of what happened), focus, constant attention, attention to detail, often leads to different “witnesses” not in agreement.
It is also true that witness statements - what persons think they saw - wrongly convict people sometimes.
That is why indpendent and cooborative evidence recorded somehow at the same time is often needed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.