To: Fido969
The payoff on the loans must have been more than the value of the property.
I don't think that's that likely.. Even in a crappy place like SanFran, three thousand rooms of hotel is quite a lot of property. If it was just about saving money from being underwater, they would have made this decision a year or two ago. At six months left, they should have about 5% of the total loan remaining. Do they really think the hotels have lost 95% of their value? (Actually more since the loan is likely somewhat less than the original value.)
To: Svartalfiar
You don’t know if it were an amortized loan or a balloon loan.
This was a business decision. They didn’t give anything up.
41 posted on
06/06/2023 10:44:26 AM PDT by
Fido969
(45 is Superman! )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson