[Big Giant Head]

I’ve seen some charts that show CO2 levels and planet heating that make it look like CO2 could indeed be a problem.

Until one zooms in. The heat comes first, the CO2 follows. it’s a lagging indicator.

So, The planet heats from the sun, the earth’s sub mantle heating the oceans, etc. and it gets hot right? So CO2 follows along, feeding the vegetation, so we have more food, trees, etc. all the good things nice little greenie weenies CLAIM they love. All life forms thrive when there’s more heat and vegetation.

So, to oppose this, is to be a death cult. I guess.

[Tell It Right]

I agree with the CO₂ being a laggard, not precursor, to temps. Most importantly, I agree with what you said about warmer periods being the good times. Those are the times of higher crop yields, more predictable rain patterns, and less deaths by plague.

People used to know that until the political cult did years of brainwashing to teach the masses into hating a good thing. Until they did that in the 1990's it was common knowledge by those of us who pay attention to science that life in the Modern Warm Period is good relative to life in the cooling periods, especially the most recent one (Little Ice Age). If you look in the past we know that at least in the prior two warm periods (Medieval and Roman) the people knew that warm periods were good and cooling periods were bad. In other words, they were happy about living in their warm period (at least the climate aspect, maybe they hated being conquered by Rome or other stuff). People in the Little Ice Age would have gladly swapped places with us if they could have. They'd think that we're crazy for losing the ability to be happy about good times -- and they'd be right.