I noticed that none of the “arguments” involved science, but instead were all rhetorical disagreements.
The simple question is, “What caused the end of the last ice age? and on the Flipside, what starts the beginning of an ice age?
I noticed that
\/
And I noticed this is the 2nd denier story posted by this poster in 24 hours.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4155123/posts
Must be the latest cubicle assignment.
These are straw man arguments. The real argument is that to end fossil fuels we have to allow half the world to starve and or freeze to death, so it is better to let the world warm up by another 1 degree over the next 100 years .
These are straw man arguments. The real argument is that to end fossil fuels we have to allow half the world to starve and or freeze to death, so it is better to let the world warm up by another 1 degree over the next 100 years .