” possess weapons and even kill someone and walk”
Against self defense, check.
“Against self defense, check.”
Depends upon your definition of self defense. Self defense doesn’t automatically free the shooter of the responsibility shooting someone. If that was the case we would be back into the old west when you could come up behind someone who shot at you yesterday and while his gun is holstered, you could aim and take the back of his head. And neither ones of the people he killed had guns.
“Regardless of whether you carry a handgun or some other self-defense tool, the goal of self-defense is to survive and escape without injury by deterring or stopping aggressive behavior. It is not to win a fight or harm another person. In fact, the best defense is to avoid dangerous people and places in the first place.”
Concealedcarry-ed.com is produced by Kalkomey Enterprises, LLC. Kalkomey is an official state-delegated provider that provides handgun education courses and certification and publishing handgun safety education materials.
https://www.concealedcarry-ed.com/
He had no reason to be there, carrying a weapon he was inexperienced in judging it’s use. Saying he could, doesn’t mean he should.
wy69