Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: daniel1212
[...] but I will ask: How does this, in principle at least, oppose and exclude support for the Biblical account, if [...]

Please re-read my post.

Overwrought interpretations of half-understood scientific papers providing weak support for or at least not outright opposing established Biblical doctrines are of little to no use...

I am saying that an article which seems to slightly support the Bible, or which - at best - doesn't contradict it, should be given only minimal attention.

It's not Earth-shaking. And it encourages a certain mode of thinking that can lead down dark paths.

Understand now?

Regards,

123 posted on 05/09/2023 11:01:54 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: alexander_busek

Thanks. Better write up than the article from MSN: https://scitechdaily.com/an-underground-ocean-scientists-discover-water-deep-within-earth/


134 posted on 05/09/2023 5:55:02 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned+destitute sinner, trust Him who saves, be baptized + follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson