In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 05/05/2023 Vol.458, Q Day 2016 , Steve Van Doorn wrote: |
Reminder: Ivermectin should NOT be taken regularly. When there is signs of illness. It is a class schedule 4 poison equal to Ammonia and Petrol. I can get into the details though it’s not good for you for regular use. |
Ivermectin must be the most politicized medication in history after 'the pill'.
When the MSM was lying to us about Ivermectin safety, telling people to call the poisoning hotline or that they had received calls to the poisoning hotline by those taking Ivermectin, I tried looking it up to see what kind of documentation there was for toxicity. I couldn't find any for humans, but found one case of an overdosed pony and one case of an overdosed dog, and it's HARD to overdose on. Sadly, I believe the NIH ran some experimental trials on people for use in Covid in which they intentionally used to high of doses in order to 'prove' it wasn't safe (or was that HCQ, or both?)
In Japan there's no need for a prescription for Ivermectin - people take it as needed. In Aftrican countries it's distributed without medical supervision to villagers to combat River Blindness. Ivermectin is a Lupus drug, and patients are advised to take it regularly.
When we were first learning about Ivermectin re Covid, some people told me they've been taking it for years without problem.
Here's my conspiracy theory. We dose dogs, cats, and livestock for parasites, but there's no medical assumption in the US that parasites are found in humans just as often. I think some parasites are 'tolerated' well and don't present as illness and there's no public information about how the average person should plan to shed parasites through supplements or annual visits etc. Owning pets or walking barefoot across a lawn or swimming are common ways to get parasites.
I do wonder if our medical regime turned a blind eye to Ivermectin in the US a long time ago because parasites could be useful biowarfare vectors. I know, sounds crazy but I the medical overthrow of the 'Old Medicine' we knew began with Bayh-Dole act in the 80's and accelerated in the early 90's (George W Bush) when the NIH and CDC set up their 501(c)3's to accept funds from big pharma and 'collaborate' with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. So Japan can use Ivermectin as OTC without harm but in the US, the public is warned it's poison. Just my tin-foil breaktime today.
PS: Dr. Lee Merrit has some novel theories about parasites in the human population, and outlines how she has been methodically ridding herself of various classes of parasites (different medications).
RN: Here’s my conspiracy theory. We dose dogs, cats, and livestock for parasites, but there’s no medical assumption in the US that parasites are found in humans just as often.
SW: VIDEO PROOF: CANCER IS CAUSED BY PARASITES
https://www.bitchute.com/video/70yyHUzq-sU/
Royal R. Rife and then Dr Hulda Clark were saying these things back in the previous century and advocating frequency-based targeting methods, which of course ran against the establishment’s narratives even then. No conspiracy “theory”; conspiracy fact, once again.
There’s no need for a prescription for Ivermectin here either. They sell it at Tractor Supply...
PS: Dr. Lee Merrit has some novel theories about parasites in the human population, and outlines how she has been methodically ridding herself of various classes of parasites (different medications).
Ha! She is one of my all time faves.
I just read her parasite protocol, last night.
Not for the squeamish :-)
I’ve been reading a lot on medical studies lately. IIRC, the CDC/NIH study on IVM was under dosed at 3 mg (the dose for a small child) and failed to include C, D3 and zink.
The hydrocloriquin study was the one they over dosed.
I think it was the front line doctors that panned the studies. Might have been Dr. Malon. Or both.
I’m posting from my phone without internet or I would try to find it.
I’ve been reading a lot on medical studies lately. IIRC, the CDC/NIH study on IVM was under dosed at 3 mg (the dose for a small child) and failed to include C, D3 and zink.
The hydrocloriquin study was the one they over dosed.
I think it was the front line doctors that panned the studies. Might have been Dr. Malon. Or both.
I’m posting from my phone without internet or I would try to find it.