In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 04/17/2023 Vol.456, Q Day 1997 , nclaurel wrote: RFK Jr is wrong if he thinks Trump didn’t give people access to those meds. It was the CDC/states, and the media, that refused and demonized them. Would it not have been possible that Trump could have by Executive Order mandated HCQ and Ivermectin be available to those who wanted them? If jabs and lockdowns could be mandated and “right to try” allowed would it have been possible to override states and others who objected? Just a question.
The article provides the MSM's timeline for the battle over HCQ which extended from March to August.
It documents Trump advocating it as a game changer and urging distribution - the NIH and other organizations saying it doesn't work. A fake study (too high a dose) resulting in deaths, Heart association and others claiming it can cause heart attack (NEW information after decades of use!).
Others on Twitter warn not to listen to Trump, or that he's practicing medicine without a license, and that people should listen to the experts instead.
FDA publishes warning: "reports of serious heart rhythm problems and other safety issues, including blood and lymph system disorders, kidney injuries, and liver problems and failure."
Fauci: "The overwhelming, prevailing clinical trials that have looked at the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine have indicated that it is not effective in coronavirus disease," Fauci says.
Here's a quote near the end of the article timeline heading, Trump doubles down.
"The president continues to claim hydroxychloroquine has been criticized as a treatment "because I supported it." ~Trump
So Trump tried but the NIH, FDA, Heart Association and others said it doesn't work or is harmful. I was surprised to see that there was an EUA for HCQ for awhile, but the FDA recinded it saying "It doesn't work."
This was back when Pelosi went on television, frightening the public saying that the president was detatched from reality, telling people to drink bleach, and that "The President of the United States is trying to murder Americans."
Medical agencies and physicians stress that the medication should only be given in a hospital setting, as the Deep State ensured that hospitals would not be allowed to provide HCQ. With the gyrations of the medical establishment, the head of the pharmalogical society warned it would investigate any pharmacist who filled prescriptions for HCQ on the issue of medical ethics and professionalism. That's actually a thread I posted - the forked tongue threats.
I also linked a pharmacist angrily saying she was told she'd be fired if she filled an order the doctor was requesting. If they could get HCQ past the blocade, they could have proven it works. As it was there were accounts in the media, some of them politicians saying it saved their lives, but nothing matters without credentials or agency stamp of approval.
So Trump could give an EO for the drug but couldn't stop the medical threats, firings of those daring to prescribe or fill the medications, and he'd be writing that EO at a time when all the medical experts were saying it doesn't work and causes heart/blood/kidney/liver and lymph problems and failures. Twitter took down his HCQ advocacy posts declaring them 'misinformation'And this was when it seemed to me that Pelosi et. al. were trying to suggest that Trump's approach to the pandemic was so reckless and detatched from reality that we 'needed' help from the UN.
RFK Jr. has said that Event 201 was not the only trial run for the pandemic information control/procedures. He said he'd found another 20 such international 'pandemic preparation' events going back more than 10 years. Somehow they missed equine Ivermectin.
