I disagree. The point of Roe was that abortion is somehow an inalienable right beyond legislative prohibition. Dobbs point (rightly) was that Roe was wrong about that, and that abortion is appropriately a state policy matter.
I agree. My only beef in the aftermath is when states think they have jurisdiction over what takes place outside their borders, which is what the headline disingenuously said.
“My only beef in the aftermath is when states think they have jurisdiction over what takes place outside their borders, which is what the headline disingenuously said.”
Which was a major point in my entry. But it also forces the decision of the medical procedure with that back into the courts thus redirecting the decision away from the people just like the feds did. And using the courts was the only way the feds could justify getting into personal medical decisions as it was not in the US Constitution.
wy69
“My only beef in the aftermath is when states think they have jurisdiction over what takes place outside their borders, which is what the headline disingenuously said.”
Which was a major point in my entry. But it also forces the decision of the medical procedure with that back into the courts thus redirecting the decision away from the people just like the feds did. And using the courts was the only way the feds could justify getting into personal medical decisions as it was not in the US Constitution.
wy69