Well considering HS biology was 40 years ago, cut me some slack. I assume you are some kind of a medical doctor because you spout off like a rather arrogant one. I also seem to recall you are from California so I’ll cut you some slack.
Either you read every thread and every associated comment or you and Duke are one in the same, BOTS commenting only on the VAX.
I feel so privileged to be chastised by such arrogant know it alls. Not once have I seen you refer to yourself as a microbiologist, virologist or expert in immunology. I’ll stack my two PhDs up against yours any day. Since my area is Orbital Mechanics and Astrodynamics , I may be at a disadvantage arguing with the “medical” community.
Good luck pushing the VAX.
Ok Doctor, (Actually I am impressed by your pedigree those are quite impressive subjects and I mean that sincerely!). The point is that the article cited that has riled up the usual illiterati clearly describes that the graphene oxide is essentially a focusing lens for electron microscopy. It is used to analyze the actual vaccine. It is used in post production study and as an inert medium to better resolve detail of the structure. Hence, it is never used in production nor is it ever able to be injected. Now I am not a physicist like you, however, blots are clearly the domain of areas of the study of biologists.
Please be well.