If it turns out that criminal cases can be made based on accounting records not accurately reflecting transactions relating to elections then there are plenty of Democrats subject to indictment and prosecution.
Hillary Clinton and the DNC admitted to doing exactly that in their accounting for the funding of the Steele Dossier.
Why shouldn't they be held to the same legal standards as Republicans?
The Manhattan District Attorney’s legal case against Trump is legally weak, and shouldn’t have been pursued. There is a reason that it wasn’t pursued until now. A District Attorney has a responsibility to do justice and the to follow the law, and if a case ultimately is so weak that it cannot be legally sustained at trial, it shouldn’t be pursued at all. Bragg is wrong.
The law isn’t a weapon meant to be twisted against political enemies, no matter how much one might disagree with them. That’s what third world dictatorships engage in.
It’s wrong. Period. Full Stop. No matter who the target is. We don’t shred the Constitution and turn the law into a weapon to target political opponents.
If there is a valid, clear, legal case that supports criminality within the bounds of the Constitution and the law, then and only then should a case be pursued.