[SERKIT]

Does Bragg intend to claim that Trump was previously convicted of an election related crime in order to bootstrap a New York misdemeanor and combine them into a new felony?

If no, does Bragg intent to litigate (or re-litigate) charges made, or investigations completed and dismissed, from years ago?

How, legally, can Bragg prosecute Federal election crimes where no such powers exist?

[WildHighlander57]

To my knowledge, PDJT hasn’t been convicted of -anything- election related.

As far as I know, the statute of limitations on felonies is 5 years.

And the constitution says there can’t be double jeopardy, so can’t re-use cases.

Braggy can’t prosecute a fed level case; he is at state level.

[Bob Ireland]

***How, legally, can Bragg prosecute Federal election crimes where no such powers exist***

Possibly one of the super clever original DS conspirators, like Andrew Weissmann, could get the DoJ to re-litigate the old campaign finance 'disparity' in order to tie it to DA Bragg's case. The Manhattan judge has allowed plenty of time for Bragg to fabricate a federal felony tie-in.

I doubt that there is any limit to the depth this cabal will sink to in the seditious cess pool in order to be rid of this populist champion!

Thank goodness these Ivy League geniuses are dumber than a septic siphon! (Of course, when everyone is in on the paste up, does it matter?)