Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Fireone

No it is not that simple.

Movies, use of force and force on force classes.

All have safety prodigals that do not have the person using the gun. Checking it.

The safety personnel do not want a person screwing around with a weapon they have declared safe.

If you let the person using it screw with it. You are introducing another factor that you do not have control of as a safety person.

If the safety prodigals were not followed it is not the end users responsibility.


40 posted on 03/15/2023 10:31:41 AM PDT by riverrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: riverrunner

I understand your point about the stipulated Safety Officer being last to handle a weapon. If I was in Baldwin’s place I would have wanted to observe the weapon being prepared for an In-your-face rehearsal.


41 posted on 03/15/2023 10:52:07 AM PDT by KC Burke (Diversity, Inclusion and Equity is not another way to spell GOD but it is a way to spell DIE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: riverrunner

As I stated in my first response, a lot of folks don’t know the basics of handling firearms.
Movies, Hollywood, Washington D.C. aren’t special places with different basic handling protocols.
You treat every firearm as loaded, you never point a firearm at something you don’t intend to shoot.
Baldwin, as the end user had a responsibility to check the firearm. He is not absolved of this responsibility because he’s an actor.
It really is that simple.


46 posted on 03/15/2023 12:13:51 PM PDT by Fireone (The only reason our elections are complicated is because the cheaters want it that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson