[logi_cal869]

I’m afraid that my point wasn’t clear enough.

I care not about the monkeys, nor the tools.

The point is that this is a RARE example of science admitting it was wrong, to the betterment of science.

In gross contrast to all the other examples about which many of us have posted prior.

[nicollo]

“People were not happy with monkeys being able to create those artifacts,” she added. “And somewhere in the records of macaque and early hominid tools, there must be a difference. But right now, the diagnostic criteria we’re using can’t find one.”

"Science!"

[logi_cal869]

But right now, the diagnostic criteria we’re using can’t find one.”

Mea culpa. In contrast to 'consensus', that's science.