Would you object to calling the Frankenstein’s Monster Not-A-Vax an mRNA gene therapy injection?
If not, why not?
Presuming you won’t insult our intelligence by calling it a vaccine, what would you yourself call it?
Or are you, based on your vocation, just as unqualified to opine in this area as you say Steve Kirsch is?
I don’t opine. I read medical studies at Nature, Mayo, PubMed and cite them. I leave make believe opining to Kirsch and other frauds.
“Would you object to calling the Frankenstein’s Monster Not-A-Vax an mRNA gene therapy injection? If not, why not?”
mRNA plays no role in gene therapy. The two types of RNA that do play a role in gene therapy are dsRNA and RNAi. Follow the link:
https://www.genomicseducation.hee.nhs.uk/blog/rna-based-therapies-two-types-explained/
“Presuming you won’t insult our intelligence by calling it a vaccine, what would you yourself call it?”
A vaccine is something that trains the immune system to recognize an antigen and build an antibody to fight it. The mRNA shots do exactly that. The medical world calls them vaccines, conspiracy fans will call them whatever they feel like. Emotion rules supreme in conspiracy world.