This lady digs deep.
https://elizabeththepunisherdove.substack.com/p/con-inc-and-the-red-pilled-antifa-adb
______________________________________________
I read the article today. She introduces people, gives some background about them, talks about her research on them and then doesn’t make a clear conclusion about her research or the people. I know that I can be too linear in my thinking and that my brain likes to follow the dots to their logical conclusion. It doesn’t easily allow for skipping dots or sometimes appreciating any random non-linear dots thrown into an explanation. In Elizabeth’s article, I wasn’t able to follow her dots, which seemed like all over the place to me. What was she trying to tell us about the people she mentioned? I even came away thinking she thinks Flynn might be a BH. This is a colossal fail on my part, but I need some cliff notes on her conclusions from anyone whose thinking is more expansive than mine.
I agree that her presentation is NOT my style, too rambling, offhand etc. Definitely she does NOT think Flynn is a BH, but others are trying to get people to think that, particularly Lin Wood. I will not post another link to her, but if I read more articles (I will try) and any are more cogent and to the point, I’ll post.