[Texas Fossil]

Sorry. Did not mean to insult.

I never read Live Science.

But the wording of the article was meant to be cute and I was not impressed with content.

[Sirius Lee]

But the wording of the article was meant to be cute

Black holes aren't cute so much as they are attractive.

[logi_cal869]

I was neither impressed with the content. So little that I incurred a rare locked thread for failing to search first, despite what appears to be unimpressive research bearing the fault.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4132960/posts

My comment stands:

Money quote:

"The team concluded that the explanation that best fits the streak is a supermassive black hole blasting through the gas that surrounds its galaxy while compressing that gas enough to trigger star formation in its wake."

The ignorance of that statement is astounding, considering their reported observations. Does anyone else see what they discovered? Presuming, of course, that their observations are accurately reported.

It continues to amaze me that so-called 'scientists' create their own echo chambers - in many cases institutionally, e.g., 'climate', 'big bang', etc.

"Small minds."

SMH

[zeestephen]

Re: "Sorry. Did not mean to insult."

I apologize for my sarcasm, Texas Fossil.

There is a clique of anti-MSN.com trolls at Free Republic who constantly attack me.

I thought you were one of them.

Politically, MSN.com is relentlessly anti-Conservative, so Freepers are entitled to attack their political news stories.

However, MSN.com does an excellent job of curating Science and Technology articles from hundreds of different journals and websites that no individual would ever have the time to search for.