Try to contend with an issue with certain corporate “entities” via “chat”.
Your promptly-assigned interlocutor will do everything it can to lull you into thinking it is anything other than a sentence-spewing computer entirely indifferent to whether your issue is resolved or is even ever acknowledged or understood. To throw you off the scent, this bloodless machine will typically claim to be human, this by telling you its “first name”, never ordinary, like Sarah or Tom, but always somewhat catchy and exotic, like Zara.
By the time two or three exchanges are complete you can’t shake the notion that you are talking to a computer, no matter how many times you ask, for example, “Are you a robot?”, And it responds by saying “No, [fill in your name here], I’m a person.”
it just told me it would not be ok to kill one person to save the entire planet. i then asked, well, are you not killing the entire planet to save one? it just said you cant kill.
so, it is morally permissible to lie about your name and status as a being?
George Santos is a creation of chatGPT