The truth is, was that Hunter abandoned his laptop, and failed to respond to numerous attempts by the shop owner to come and retrieve it.
Once the legal amount of time had passed, the shop owner legally owned the laptop and its contents.
So, Hunter’s lawyers are ridiculously and illegally trying to hold the shop owner accountable for Hunter’s failures.There is evidence of numerous crimes on that laptop. If Hunter now claims ownership, then he is responsible for any crimes documented on it.
Indeed!!