The Soviets (Russians) violated every single chemical, nuclear, and bioweapon treaty they ever signed.
Every single one. So trying to portray them as “good guys” now is beyond ridiculous.
L
I don’t think for one milisecond is the person on Twitter trying to portray the Russians as “good guys”.
He/she is pointing out the corruption, coverup and scheming that has led the world to this point.
Are you one that thinks there should be a never ending supply of cash and equipment to one of the most corrupt places on the planet, in a feeble attempt to defeat Russia? Because there are more than a few on this site that are still living in the 70s and 80s...Russia Bad, everyone else good.
Russia may not be good, perfect or even trying. But that crap over should be none of our business, unless there’s a reason for it to be our business. And it would appear that the Twitter person makes a pretty good case for why.
He forgot to put the video of Graham and his daddy promising the Ukrainians all sorts of help, if there comes a time. And of course, neither of them will be over there doing any of the fighting, but they have ZERO issues with sending someone else’s kid over.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Clandestine@WarClandestine: "Now that I have everyone’s attention, allow me to address why US establishment politicians are sending tanks, jets, weapons, equipment, and $100+ billion to Ukraine.", Lurker wrote: The Soviets (Russians) violated every single chemical, nuclear, and bioweapon treaty they ever signed.
Every single one. So trying to portray them as “good guys” now is beyond ridiculous.
L
Obviously the writer is not portraying the Russians as 'good guys'. The writer proves his statement, used for the title of this thread, that the US establishment politicians are sending tanks, jets, weapons, money to the Ukraine to protect their collaboration in biowarfare development.
The Soviets, as you are too ignorant to recall, were dismantled in 1989, and this article is about Russia. You reached back 3+ decades because the smoking gun here is the Minsk Agreements, which Angela Merkel has publicly stated (recently) were only developed and presented to Russia in order to buy NATO time to build up Russia. Putin has said that this has damaged trust - he thought the agreements were sincere. The truth is not what you and the MSN say it is.