Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bankwalker; All

Yes. The strongest argument against the FairTax is that the 16th Amendment would still be there.

In other words, Congress could pass the FairTax and eliminate all income taxes ..... but ..... at some point in the future sneak a little income tax back in, a little here, a little there, for the children, and what not.

Congress at a time in the future could sneak some income tax back in, and make it grow. We’d have a metastasis of taxinoma, both FairTax and Income tax.

All because the 16th is still sitting there looking pretty with its sinister implications.

So the FairTax authors looked at the 16th raising its ugly head in the future and the thinking was:

1. Can the 16th be repealed? Well yeah, duh. But ain’t gonna happen. Guam will capsize before that happens.

Well, what to do?

2. Build into the FairTax a 7-year Sunset provision. If the 16th isn’t repealed in 7 years, FairTax goes bye-bye.

The bet was we’d like the FairTax so much that we would rush out to repeal the 16th.

Um ..... that ranks up there with 81 million flies voted for Bidung. Congress would just keep extending the Sunset clause.

So yeah, the FairTax and the 16th are a toxic mix


22 posted on 01/26/2023 5:32:02 AM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Hostage

The ‘Fair Tax’ isn’t.

It is as stupid and rife with pitfalls as the current system, only it makes it easier.

They (the ‘Fair Tax’ proponents) always insist on two horrible things: Tax-inclusive pricing, and a ‘prebate’.
Both of which are the exact opposite of what you want to do when reforming a tax system to make it simpler.

In the current system, the richest 10% pay 90% of all taxes. The poorest pay nothing EXCEPT FOR all corporate taxes, and excise taxes on things like cigarettes and alcohol.

And the stupidest people don’t realize how much ‘corporate tax’ they pay, because they think the evil corporation pays it.

They don’t understand the concept of ‘cost of goods sold’ (an accounting term) which means that all costs are rolled up into the the final cost of the item, so you know if you are selling at a profit or not.

The ‘Fair tax’ is also normally quoted at 27%. (??? Do you want to give a third of your income to the government, poor people?) But with a ‘tax-inclusive’ system that rate is hidden. You know what the price of an item is, but you don’t know how much of that is taxes.

Think of the price you pay for gasoline. How much of that price per gallon is taxes? You don’t know because it is ‘tax inclusive’ price. If you knew that $35 of the $50 you just spent for a fill-up was taxes, you would be even less happy with the price.

Sure you could calculate it, but it requires you to not be stupid. I could go on for an hour on how bad the ‘tax inclusive’ rate is’

And the ‘prebate’ is a nightmare. All Democrats will be trying to out-do each other promising bigger and bigger prebate at every election, until it becomes a guaranteed minimum income.

In short, the ‘Fair Tax’ (as it has been proposed) is a liberal’s dream


34 posted on 01/26/2023 6:10:17 AM PST by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson