Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: fr_freak; NCcatdaddy
Let me give you an example of how your CDC quote could be complete horse apples, even if their data is 100% accurate.

Sorry for the slow response.

The ONLY type of "unvaccinated" person, then, who will present himself to any health organization will be, BY DEFINITION, one who requires treatment. That skews the data on a parabolic trajectory.

Not really, because, likewise, the only vaccinated person in this study who will be counted also requires treatment.

The population being studied is those who required hospitalization.

The question is simple. Of those who required hospitalization for Covid how many were vaccinated vs. not and what’s the underlying vaccination rate in that population.

139 posted on 01/24/2023 5:10:55 PM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: semimojo

I think you might have missed the most important element:

The exact number of “vaccinated” is known, because they track those people once they’ve received the jab

The exact number of “unvaccinated” is unknown because nobody comes in and says “Hi I’m not getting the jab!”

the true rate of hospitalization would be (# of hospitalized)/total number of people, and “total number of people” of “unvaccinated” is greatly underestimated, by factors of ten most likely.


140 posted on 01/24/2023 8:26:32 PM PST by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson