Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: servantoftheservant; gas_dr

” 7 years, before he made the mistake of showing HCQ was effective”

McCullough didn’t have anything to do with “showing HCQ was effective”. That comes from a 2005 study using chloroquine against SARS-1. It’s been available at PubMed for 18 years.

It was performed in vitro on SARS infected green monkey kidney tissue and it worked great. But when SARS-2 arrived and there was a chance to try it in vivo in human beings it didn’t work like it had in the lab.


64 posted on 01/22/2023 12:36:36 AM PST by Pelham (#NeverNikki)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Pelham
That comes from a 2005 study using chloroquine against SARS-1. It’s been available at PubMed for 18 years.

Do you have a link to that study? I'm interested in comparing it to the studies that showed Chloroquine, Hydroxychloroquine, and Quercetin taken with Zinc eliminating the SARS-COV2 virus.

Coronavirus Epidemic Update 34: US Cases Surge, Chloroquine & Zinc Treatment Combo, Italy Lockdown. The end of this video shows the study with the effects of HCQ in getting zinc into the cells.

Coronavirus Pandemic Update 35: New Outbreaks & Travel Restrictions, Possible COVID-19 Treatments (Quercetin). This video adds Quercetin to the mix of zinc ionophores that are measured comparatively.

I'd like to know if your cited study included zinc or was just chloroquine?

-PJ

70 posted on 01/22/2023 12:55:33 AM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson