“We is us, you and me, the general public.”
I am sure you do not speak for me or other members of the Free Republic.
“I can provide dozens and dozens of similar reports from healthcare systems all over the world. You’re free to ignore the evidence but don’t pretend it isn’t there.”
Your last statement does not make any sense if you do not understand why clinical presentation and outcome is important. Don’t pretend proper clinical and presentation is not important.
“What do clinical presentation and outcome have to do with it?”
Clinical presentation and outcome are important in making decisions about vaccine effectiveness because they provide a more complete picture of how the vaccines are impacting the population. Clinical presentation refers to the symptoms and characteristics of a disease in an individual patient. Outcomes refer to the end result of a disease or treatment, such as hospitalization or death. By looking at both the clinical presentation and outcome in a group of patients, researchers and healthcare professionals can better understand the overall effectiveness of the vaccine in preventing severe illness and hospitalization. Additionally, by looking at how the vaccines impact different subpopulations (e.g. elderly, immunocompromised), we can identify any potential disparities in vaccine effectiveness or safety concerns: then take steps to address them.
I am seeking more information on the clinical presentation and outcomes of the vaccine to ensure its safety. Is it unreasonable for me to want this information before making a decision about vaccination?
Given that the experts of the government have controversial views on gender identity, is it reasonable to question their ability to make sound decisions about the safety of a vaccine?
A lot of the vaccine safety data is coming from the same goverment experts.
Given that these experts may believe in concepts that are not supported by common sense, should we question their judgment in ensuring the safety of a vaccine?
Is it reasonable not to trust a government with a history of poor financial management to effectively manage the safety, distribution and administration of the vaccine?
Feel free go ahead and trust those goverement experts, I will not.
I'm not speaking for anyone but myself but since I know you have internet access I know you have access to this data.
I have access and you have access, so we have access. QED
By looking at both the clinical presentation and outcome in a group of patients, researchers and healthcare professionals can better understand the overall effectiveness of the vaccine in preventing severe illness and hospitalization.
We already have the data on effectiveness in preventing hospitalization. If we didn't have the data we may have to rely on your presentation data, but we do.
Regardless of the presentation we know the outcome - hospitalization, death or both.
Is it unreasonable for me to want this information before making a decision about vaccination?
Not at all. Do your research and make your choice.
Given that the experts of the government have controversial views on gender identity, is it reasonable to question their ability to make sound decisions about the safety of a vaccine?
Amazing. That's the most strained anti-vax rationalization I've ever heard.