I believe your interpretation of the published images of the Apollo landing sites do not show what you believe they show:
This is like the “face on Mars” discussion.
The “face” is not “real” or “fake”—there are merely correct and incorrect interpretations of what is shown there.
Real astronauts will walk on the alleged landing sites and the debate will be over...
Apollo attempted to achieve the impossible given the technology of the time.
Photos cannot make the impossible possible.
You believe thousands and thousands of people intimately involved in the Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo programs, some of the finest minds produced by this country, were all liars.
And all the test pilots. Many combat veterans. Cold warriors. Deeply patriotic people like Bill Anders, Jim Lovell and Frank Borman, who bravely crewed the first Saturn V launch, and left earth orbit for the first time in human history, and orbited the Moon on Christmas Eve, 1968.
You believe all that, and everything since was a hollywood production? That’s insane.
The lunar surveyor satellite photographs show exactly what they should show. Weird, isn’t it? There’s no optical illusion, they illustrate that the landings occurred, because all the hardware is sitting there, the lower stages of the LM, the tracks, the moon rovers, everything.