marc andreeson had a post earlier this month where chatgpt said it was no longer allowed to discuss positive elements of fossil fuel use.
that’s not my experience
but in my time on it (only a few weeks) I’ve seen it give qualifiers to writing poetry which it didn’t do when I first got on it and I’ve also seen it get a fact wrong (nothing controversial or opinion oriented) and then I asked it to doublecheck and it came back with the correct answer and said it was sorry about the previous answer....
in my experience it would depend on how you ask the question
you can’t pick a fight with it and it’s also not going to easily weigh in on things that are clearly in the realm of opinion
but if you use it for sort of basic research and straight up facts (like I do) its an amazing tool and I’ve used it in this capacity for several projects generally in the energy realm and it never maligns oil and gas....and when facts about the benefits of oil and gas are relevant to the discussion, it never hesitates to cough them up
all that said, here soon i will push the envelope on oil and gas facts and see if it goes green fanatic