I hope 90% is not the standard for spotting trolls and disinformation specialists.If so who here has a 90% record over and over,that's hard to achieve. I doubt DJT could come close to 90% in his many comments,its just hard to do.
Disinfo is used extensively by malignant actors AND by the good guys. Anything the Trump team says right now has to be understood as meant also for the enemy. Such as Gen.Flynn scoffing at Q, the idea of a plan, military action, etc.
Hopefully an article will come down to road explaining that in detail. Kayfabe is happening, plus ghost in the machine stuff - modern version of mockup rubber tanks sitting in a field in the north of Englad in WW2.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 01/17/2023 Vol.446, Q Day 1908, rodguy911 wrote: I learned how influencers are groomed and planted within movements to spread 90% truth with a carefully crafted 10% disinformation to lead people off the important trails. I hope 90% is not the standard for spotting trolls and disinformation specialists.If so who here has a 90% record over and over,that's hard to achieve. I doubt DJT could come close to 90% in his many comments,its just hard to do.
I think analysts and infiltrators 'batting averages' are based on different criteria.
Someone can link a few sources and tell you what they think it means, and you may or may not agree with them. If they are wrong sometimes, you can decide if they are too inaccurate or made honest mistakes and whether to keep reading what they have to say, because you like their insights.
I think infiltrators too often state or imply they have 'inside sources' and their sources are therefore confidential, so you can't find out for yourself, not only are you unable to check out their sources, but you can't dig on related information. You can't 'Q' the content; you just have to believe them or trust them etc. They may offer some partial information, but often weave a perspective that gently starts to divurge from the information you can dig on (so do you trust what you dug up or trust their insider telling you that content is wrong).
Then infiltrators seem to form cooperatives wherein they support each other's veracity, and following them means you start to hear from multiple sources similar content which is meant to make the reader feel what they are hearing is 'verified' or 'everyone knows...'. If one of them falls under exposure, the other infiltrators in the group use their 'good reputations' to shore him/her up and regain standing.
They can use Google, if they want to, to ask to receive a notification email if their name is menioned on the web. So if you 'prove' something they said is ridiculous or suspicious, their next post may just 'happen' to rebut or correct that impression. It helps them manage their online image.
Are you talking about me? How to get alerted when your name is used online
Some of them insert themselves into the Trump campaign sphere, because who doesn't like people willing to roll up their sleeves and volunteer, and hold fund raisers among followers to bring in the bucks?
Once thanked as a donor/volunteer, they name drop their Trump associations as if they in his inner circle. They talk about staying at Mar A Lago often, and I suspect they are there for campaign events for the afternoon, if at all. If they flat make it up, Trump or his campaign managers are not going to refute them ('...infiltrator XYZ said he was at Mar A Lago last week, but he wasn't...").