Insightful Comments !
A Wired special issue noted that modern AI will be directed by “data scientist” “trainers” rather than programmers — those who choose and curate the datasets.
So AI will be as woke as the social media and news media, but you won’t be able to debug it and find some smoking gun left wing code. You won’t even be able to definitively find the particular data it was fed.
We recently learned that the deep state directs what commenters, comments, and assertions (factoids) the social and news media allow to see daylight. That filtration of thought in turn appears in the responses of the AI. AI is, and will increasingly be, embraced ( as “the science” ) because it confirms the tenets of the cult of woke and presents a wall of plausible deniability to anyone skeptical.
Exactly. It’s all about the data sets used in training, not the code.
For engineering I see this as a tool. Today I asked it to compare the abilities of the FDP-Link vs. MIPI CSI-3 interfaces (Camera electronics). It provided me with precise details and how each might be appropriate depending on the use-cases, along with what those are. So instead of me hunting down information, of varying quality, via Google - it brought all the relevant information to me and made the requested comparison.
As a non-lawyer I could use this to get more knowledgeable about a legal situation. I asked, “In Michigan, if a law enforcement officer demands my identification but won’t specify what offense I’ve committed am I required to provide it?”. The response was spot on (to my understanding :) ).
I wonder, once it has an ability for you to provide pictures, could it provide a medical diagnosis? You provide all your symptoms - how accurate would the suggested medication be compared to a doctor? Could it be authorized to prescribe?
All crazy...