Replies

Some real legitimate verifiable numbers

Like the adverse reaction numbers big pharma hid in their 50,000 page doc they tried to hide for the next 75 years ?

Like that kind of numbers ?

Or the prebunked numbers ?

Legitimate / verifiable numbers my arse.

Urinalists.

Is there any pee they won’t call rain ?

Like the adverse reaction numbers big pharma hid in their 50,000 page doc they tried to hide for the next 75 years ?

This might seem a bit nit-picky, but you're probably referring to the FOIA case brought by "Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency" against the FDA which you can find on PACER with this case number 4:21-cv-1058-P, or on Scribed if you don't have a PACER account. This seems to be the most common source for the "someone or other" wanted to hide the data for "75 years" claims, and the counter-claims that precise thing never happened.

Anyway, the correct numbers are: Pages of documents covered by the FOIA:

440,000

Number of pages FDA wanted to release per month:

500

Number of pages the court ordered the FDA to release per month:

55,00

We can certainly argue about the FDA's motivation, and pressure from big pharma, but at least we can try to get our numbers right. So here's a claim that cannot be refuted:

"The FDA wanted to release the requested FOIA vaccine documents at such a slow rate (500 pages per month) that it would have taken 880 months, or 73.33 years to release all 440,000 pages covered by the FOIA." And if you want even more clarity, one could add "And the Federal court in Texas didn't let them get away with it. They were directed to release 55,000 of the covered pages each month, which took the FDA 8 months. All pages covered by the FOIA have now been released."

So maybe the next step is to look at the FOIA'd documets and find the dirt?