In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 01/10/2023 Vol.445, Q Day 1901, Steve Van Doorn wrote: said, "They have no legal excuse to get to where we are now"
In steps the prep act where under a time of an emergency informed consent is disregarded for the public good.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Readiness_and_Emergency_Preparedness_Act
Which The courts agreed.
Kehler v. Hood
https://casetext.com/case/kehler-v-hood
With the prep act in court we have to prove intent to mass murder. mass murder isn't enough.
Kind of reminds me of how we have to prove intent to overthrow our elections must be proven.
When mass "mistakes" are not enough for a new election.But wait! There's moar!
It wasn't an emergency. The Faucists claimed it was an emergency because Covid was classified as a 'novel' virus, which would mean zero members of the public would have been exposed to it before. There's proof that it's not novel, and the CDC/FAUCISTS had reason to know that.
Also, part of the 'emergency' is that there are no treatments available. But there's medical evidence that HCQ and Ivermectin were always a viable treatment and were illegally withheld.