Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: logi_cal869

DugwayDuke wrote: “The anti-vaxxers are wrong when the claim the COVID vaccines have this unique protection.”

logi_cal869 wrote: “We do love it when you expose yourself. PREP Act was specifically amended for COVID in March of 2020, by ‘declaration’ from HHS:”

The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREPA), passed by the United States Congress and signed into law by President of the United States George W. Bush in December 2005 (as part of Pub. L. 109–148 (text) (PDF)), is a controversial tort liability shield intended to protect vaccine manufacturers from financial risk in the event of a declared public health emergency. The part of PREPA that actually affords such protection is now codified at 42 U.S.C. § 247d-6d. The act specifically affords to drug makers immunity from actions related to the manufacture, testing, development, distribution, administration and use of medical countermeasures against chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear agents of terrorism, epidemics, and pandemics.

Nothing exposed. The COVID vaccines are not, as I stated, unique in their protection by the PREP act.


272 posted on 01/08/2023 10:54:02 AM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies ]


To: DugwayDuke; metmom
Enough. Drinking & posting again. Nice. /s

I misread your original response. No, the problem here is that you took a step which warrants a physical response by putting words in my mouth.

You wrote:

You omitted that ALL vaccines are protected from legal recourse by the PREP Act. The anti-vaxxers are wrong when the claim the COVID vaccines have this unique protection.
I never made that claim. To-wit, I wrote (in part as an addendum):

Deliberately injecting myself with a substance know to have that as a side effect with no legal recourse for medical liability I can help.”

and

“We do love it when you expose yourself. PREP Act was specifically amended for COVID in March of 2020, by ‘declaration’ from HHS:”

I never cited the jabs: YOU are the one who cited the jabs specifically (product liability).

A kneejerk response, we're all sure. /s

I am CORRECT that there is no legal recourse for medical liability (save for intentional misconduct, which would largely be impossible to prove under the current regime's censorship and overlapping patchwork of bureaucratic/legal protections for all concerned).

Try Jameson. It might enhance your troublesome emotions and make this more entertaining than it already is.

282 posted on 01/08/2023 12:24:53 PM PST by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson