fireman15 wrote: “It is difficult to even know where to start on this one. Suffice it to say that there are glaring issues with the way the article you linked to is written. First, there is no link to the actual study within the article. Second, quoting from the article, “The detailed analysis of nearly 43 million people was published Monday in the American Heart Association journal Circulation.” What “details are they speaking of.”
The details are in the link embedded in the second paragraph of the article. Click on ‘detailed analysis’. Come back after you’ve read the study.
Sorry I missed the link... to the "analysis" of the study. As I suspected it is comprised completely of outdated cherry picked data selected specifically to support a misleading narrative. It has absolutely zero credibility and was meant only to confuse the easily and willfully confused.
You come back after a couple years and multiple more boosters and let us know how it has worked out for you and those exposed to the dangerous spike proteins that you are shedding.