Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasGator

I have said twice now (at least) that I do not ignore a possible profit motive while pointing out that the same thing exists on a much larger scale for the products (and people promoting them). In fact, I have mentioned it long ago even before there were vaccines on the HCQ/IVM threads.

You have not even acknowledged that... strange. I don’t see any deflection - if anything I am leaning into it and willing to debate it with an open mind.

You dismiss McCullough because he started selling his supplement, but he has been saying the same things for over two years now long before I ever observed him shilling for anything. You are ignoring the motives of big pharma and all that they control (including our government in my opinion).

Again, if the “vaccines” are safe then why are they the only widely utilized (you don’t even need a prescription) “drug” on the market that still has immunity from lawsuits?

If they are so great remove the immunity - especially now that they tell us to take them like flu vaccines semi-annually.

I even wrote above in an earlier post that there is data that supports that “some” of the adverse reactions or injuries might be associated with specific lots of the vaccines. It is not unreasonable to assume that contract companies making a product under great stress might have some quality control issues given the sheer volume of doses they were making. That is a valid hypothesis that I cannot prove or disprove here in my living room. I even recall Moderna having an issue with one of these sub-contractors because of contamination.

There is a lot of data out there that supports that these vaccines have some risks which are certainly comparable to or greater than Covid for younger people or those with minimal risk factors.

The CDC admits that there is a “slight risk” (their words) of myocarditis in young people but they still recommend the vaccine for babies as young as 6 months. The article references data in 2021. In fact, the risks are so great that some Western nations have pulled them for young people!

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/myocarditis.html

Here is another - again, elevated risks for young men, like most of these white papers you can generally get the summary in the first few paragraphs if you don’t want to dive into the weeds -

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2788346

Another that even admits that we don’t know the long-term risks of myocarditis in young men so the real numbers might be much higher as not all myocarditis incidents resolve themselves and these studies focused on short time periods post-vaccine.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)00842-X/fulltext

Another one that puts the rate of myocarditis (reported) at 12.6 per million in young men PER THE CDC. That is more than 4 but far less than 25,000.

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056135

https://www.cureus.com/articles/110419-catecholamines-are-the-key-trigger-of-covid-19-mrna-vaccine-induced-myocarditis-a-compelling-hypothesis-supported-by-epidemiological-anatomopathological-molecular-and-physiological-findings

Full disclosure - I bought a toaster from that last one so they got me - I love European appliances. :)

Sidenote - McCullough has published in two of those linked above as well as the New England Journal of Medicine and many cardiology specific publications. Not too shabby for a snake oil salesman!

I expect more studies (from real medical journals) that will show there is an increased risks of myocarditis in children, teens, and young adults. The trend is undeniable and there is also now evidence that supports cardiac issues far beyond the 7 day window of the shot.

Do you have any links to published studies that say there is no increased risk? If so, please share them.

Is it 25k per million as McCullough says it is? I doubt that - that is a huge number far beyond what published papers are indicating. However, given past precedent it would likely cause concern with the FDA under normal approval procedures.

In addition, there are studies on neurological, reproductive, and clotting problems associated with the vaccines as well and then there are the indications that the vaccines have messed up peoples immune systems and maybe made them more vulnerable to Covid. I am not committed to any of this yet, but its out there and we will learn more.

When McCullough makes his first million on supplements please let me know. Pfizer and Moderna probably made just over 50 billion last year alone (not counting sales the prior year or this year) and quite a bit in 2021 as well (its hard to find a reliable number but it was more than 30 billion I believe).

It is also curious that much of the funding for the hastened research for these products came from the US taxpayer but I bet they did not reduce the costs to our government for the product NOR did they share the formula with the rest of the world. They did allegedly give the NIH “royalties” - that would be Fauci and his crew.

I thought it was a great thing for humanity and not a vehicle for massive profits, but that is a thread for another day.

The truth will come out and we will see. Save the thread and let’s revisit it next January.


201 posted on 01/07/2023 9:51:10 PM PST by volunbeer (We are living 2nd Thessalonians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]


To: volunbeer

bookmark


213 posted on 01/08/2023 12:17:10 AM PST by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson