Replies

Here’s a List of What That Speaker ‘Agreement’ Allegedly Involves
https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2023/01/06/heres-a-list-of-what-that-speaker-agreement-allegedly-involves-n684763

///////////////////////////

A “Church Committee” to investigate weaponization of the intelligence agencies (against the American People)...is very exciting.

The original Church Committee revealed much about the CIA.
Unfortunately, it just seems to have driven the illegal activities further underground, and encouraged the Agency to develop its own sources of funding outside the control of Congress and the American People—such sources utilizing the clandestine powers (”Above the law”) of the Agency to successfully engage in criminal activities in cooperation with other large cartels and corrupt organizations.

The Church Committee sat in 1976, shortly after Nixon was forced out of office in what we now know was an FBI Operation, orchestrated by Associate Director Mark Felt (”Deep Throat”), and shortly after two separate attempts on the unelected President Ford’s life, which would have delivered the Presidency to Nelson Rockefeller.

Thinking back to those days, Watergate was seen by most people as an extremely eye-opening experience, leading to much greater distrust of Government. In this climate, Jimmy Carter’s government attempted to restructure the Agency along lines suggested by the Church findings, and to regain control of its funding.

It is probably no surprise that the GHWB/Clinton drug smuggling operation, later “Hidden” under the excuse of “Iran/Contra,” commenced shortly thereafter under the aegis of VP GHWB, formerly DCIA, much empowered by the near-fatal shooting of President Reagan by CIA-connected Hinckley, whose father was a close business associate of GHWB dating back to Zapata oil days.

I think these events indicate that a Church-type investigation can potentially result in change. Likewise the events suggest that FBI and CIA will fight with a powerful arsenal against the purposes of the Committee, aided by half the Committee members (or more) being effectively under their control.

A new “Church Committee” would indeed be an exciting development. If it comes to pass, I think we will all owe a debt of gratitude to the original 20 MAGA rebels, and especially to the “J6 Six” (final holdouts in the negotiations; all voted “Present” on final ballot).