Replies

To: little jeremiah

I”m not a “fan” of Gowdy. I just paid a lot of attention to the Benghazi hearings at the time. What additional could he have done?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

If I recall, she was not required to testify under oath. She took away control of the proceedings. It made Gowdy appear totally bogged down in swamp. Ineffectual.

Those "hearings" reminded me of Ken Starr refusing to go after Bill Clinton over Chinese espionage, Arkansides, Mena drugs (which was known since 1994) and just complete corruption...instead, giving him the "Hangout" of Lewinsky which had nothing to do with High Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Gowdy came off as a tool of the DS.

612 posted on 01/06/2023 1:05:35 PM PST by Disestablishmentarian (The next war has already started. )

To: Disestablishmentarian

He didn’t require her to testify under oath? Did he request it? Did she refuse?

617 posted on 01/06/2023 1:16:50 PM PST by little jeremiah (Never worry about anything. Worry never solved any problem or moved any stone.)

To: Disestablishmentarian

PD
Maybe he didn’t want to be Arkancided?

619 posted on 01/06/2023 1:17:22 PM PST by little jeremiah (Never worry about anything. Worry never solved any problem or moved any stone.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794