And then again, they may have not. We can play “may haves” all day and night, but we just do not really know how and when they traveled. Artifacts may have ended up in different areas due to flooding or the changing of the tides and not by traveling people. We shouldn’t take a hypotheses and make it into absolutes. Researchers will often start with a “maybe” and soon people have dropped that part and changed it into a “they definitely did this” narrative. That’s how bits of “known” history is often found to be wrong. Plus, this entire premise is racist! (Or, at least it will be found to be so by the end of next week).
(I slept for only 3 hours and woke up and can’t get back to sleep so I’m feeling a bit bitchy here at 2:00 a.m.).
Thank you for your take on this.
No apologies needed for insommnia.
Do androids dream of electric sheep?
Happy New Years to you! 😊
Yeah, ‘coz stone artifacts and footprints are carried by the tides.