"Doesn’t NASA need Peter strok’s approval before working with Elon Musk’s/SpaceX?"
Doesn’t NASA need Peter strok’s approval before working with Elon Musk’s/SpaceX? Because you know, Russia...., and he once worked for the FBI?
Where’s outcry from the liberals at NYT, WAPO, because, you know....Twitter....!
Can’t wait for Merrick Gartland and Chris Ray to weigh in, because you know..... they’re corrupt!
The article is written in bizarre fashion.
For about 10 years after the Shuttle program ended, Soyuz was the only launch vehicle capable of carrying crew to and from the ISS. The US manned space program was 100% reliant on Soyuz.
Now a Soyuz capsule has a leak, apparently from a meteoroid strike associated with the Geminid shower, according to Space.com.
RosCosmos will decide by the end of December whether or not a replacement Soyuz need be launched to ferry two cosmonauts and one US astronaut back to Earth adding 45 days to the schedule, or whether the damaged Soyuz is adequately safe to perform the descent on present schedule. There is no evidence of any other damage than loss of coolant.
SpaceX was not scheduled to perform this ferry task and still is not.
They can’t use Musks rocket because Musk has become orange and bad due to allowing conservatives to speak
"Doesn’t NASA need Peter strok’s approval before working with Elon Musk’s/SpaceX?"