If it indeed has, then I think that it would be indicative of extreme desperation to keep this young man alive.
______________________________________________________
I believe that’s what’s happening in this situation while they desperately try to come up with a reason for the future declaration of his death that can withstand some superficial amount of medical scrutiny. This was the extremely public demise of a very healthy young man and they’re in a panic about people drawing the correct conclusion. They’ll try to prevent that even at the risk of appearing perfidious. They’re counting on the majority of the public being ignorant or obtuse, and will try to silence the rest of us.
They know what happened to that healthy young man and we know what happened to him. But just like “1984”, it must not be spoken and if it is, all record of it will be purged from the historical record.