It seems like some people do have negative attitudes towards the unvaccinated.
.
It’s the Oprah psychology
They believe whatever is said on TV and they lash out on anyone that doesn’t accept it.
They used the same thing with Ukraine. Twitter dump showed Propaganda Pentagon accounts that were protected and promoted - and not to be fact checked.
It’s Mob psychology.
They overwhelm and demonize any opposition.
.
Now that more and more vaccinated people are coming to the conclusions that we were right all along, and are now angry because of their future health outlook. But instead of being angry toward those who forced them to be injected with immunity destroying, DNA altering clot shots, they choose instead to be angry towards us who warned them from the beginning.
Of course. My point is that this :study" is social science aka politics masquerading as "science."
Of the article 9YearLurker has added: "Plus a deceptive writeup, citing only percentage differentials instead of actual percentages."
Well observed. The "science" being peddled has little to do with the actual "safe and effective" yet still in phase three clinical trials mRNA shots which this pseudoscience is trying to tell us is other than it is, and any of us who are skeptical are "vaccine hesitant." Never mind that the mRNA products do NOT meet the Koch postulates, do not prevent infection and allow reinfection even after boosters.
Looking for example at Michael Bang Petersen, one learns this "scientist" is in fact a political scientist, Not an epidemiologist. His CV at the university reads: "Michael Bang Petersen investigates how the adaptive challenges of human evolutionary history shape the way modern citizens think about mass politics. He directs The Politics and Evolution Lab...." These are the "scientists" busy with vaccine messaging in the midst of this "event" which has a demonstrable mortality rate of a mere 0.085 percent over three years.