little jeremiah wrote:
“
Pinging the this/n/that list, freepmail to get on or off. You would do well to read this incredible takedown of Armstrong and his black pilling fear porn. Comparing him to lamecherry is spot on although lamecherry was likely a few people and even more unreadable.
https://freerepublic.com/perl/post?id=4117830%2C719
“
ThankQ LJ!
Lamecherry was/is also fearporn.
Lamecherry was incomprehensible psycho fear porn...
*Publius has never struck anyone as ever publishing sources of “fearporn”.
(A nasty little term— “porn”.)
Cheerfully accepting the current premise that Armstrong is on par with anyone of low repute is baseless opinion, imo.
Armstrong is known mostly for his statistical accuracy. His opinions are presumably informed by that.
Armstrong is hardly known for publishing “fearporn”. Lol.
(A nasty little term “fearporn”, for proving a negative.)
Last mention of Lamecherry as far I have heard was in 2012. Quite popular then. Now, a shoe and foot change, here, lately? Hmmm?
If Armstrong is fearporn, then the Scare Event is a myth, lamecherry style.
Be careful what you swallow whole.
Agendas of noise form for herd thinking, right out of the enemy toolbox. At least, Armstrong puts his name behind his substantial work, no hiding from anyone.