The thread may be cowed from hearing any side, but for the low hanging fruit *lj sells here, rather successfully, (as I hear no complaints). 🙄
________________________________________________
It would be a mistake to assume that silence or failure to respond to any given post implies agreement with a post or being too intimidated to reply. Sometimes it just means we don’t know enough to offer an opinion. At other times, it could mean we don’t see any point in debating the number of angels who can dance on the head of a pin (unknowable truth). A third option is that we simply don’t care about the subject matter. That’s not even an exhaustive list.
A third option is that we simply don’t care about the subject matter. That’s not even an exhaustive list.
~~~~nicely said!
Yes, of course, there are several ordinary reasons why intimidating posters, slandering their sources, or the poster personally, is effective for stopping information.
It is an old tactic to frame and isolate and mock a source. It serves a purpose. — to encourage less of something, and more of disinterest and ignorance, and not caring about a subject.
I find the result interesting. The result is more to my point. The result speaks for itself.
The standard for Q Thread was, imo, originally, a bit higher. Q #1 brought “drops” and established a starting point for descaling the eyes and brains of the most curious sorts.
The early Q birds simply appreciated what was found on the Q trail, in the kinetic investigating and learning, the sharing of info here, its sources, all communicating about people, places and things.
Extraordinary to the Q Thread, now, is the pugnacious reaction of the vehemently rigid-minded person who deplore anyone posting something from anyone different from what or whom they give personal blessing.
Why would anyone want to do that, especially just because The Guardian, or some other arrogant lamestream media profiles only a case for the prosecution? But, stupid is as stupid does. Dogged derision (repeatedly) may be clinical.
For example, Juan O’Savin’s “Knowable” interview, last night, with Loy Brunson.
Imagine?
Loy Brunson!
Appearing with that foolish, droning liar, aka a common plumber and imposter, mean ole’ Juan O’Savin!
Juan announced the Brunson Trumpets will also blow on the eve of 6 January, before the hopeful and expected decision by the US Supreme Court to hear the Brunson case, or not.
I think that’s very cool and hope that Archangel Gabriel is pleased by these fine men for playing, and also by “#107”, who supports them and their case in his recent appearances.
Funny.. Kash Patel said yesterday (on Nino) he has not heard of the Brunson case to the Supreme Court!
Who is it he’s kidding?
Or, was he?
Who’s really on the inside? Was Q a larp?
What happens in a Court of Law?
Rule 11.
Kari Lake.